Sometimes I ask this question to myself, and I have been asking this question a lot more lately.
“should we allow our emotions to fluctuate or should we train ourselves to always remain in a stable state emotionally?”
To be honest, its really a question of preference, I see advantages and disadvantages in both approaches.
As a man I feel like its quite essential for me to have a good control over my emotions and not let it come in my way of work. And I have been quite good at it. There are instances when I have been in a terrible shape emotionally but I did not let it affect my work even a bit.
But this is what is shown on the outside. To the entire world. I am good at it. But I am thinking about inside in this question.
what should happen to it?
From this logic it makes sense to just train myself to be completely emotionally flatlined. Be someone who does not get upset too much when something goes wrong, or does not get too sad when gets hit with a calamity and also not get too happy when something good happens.
But,
What would that even mean? is that a life worth living? Will I ever be able to live a balanced life like that? Will that be peaceful? or will I be in a struggle with my own heart forever?
Isn’t there a saying somewhere that our emotions makes us human?
Does that mean, the more emotional we are the more human we are? Are emotions a sign of weakness or are they our strength? Are they the reason why I never give up no matter what? are they what fuel us all to keep going?
Does that mean suppressing them means we are reducing the quality of the fuel of life itself?
I don’t know. not Yet.
and I will keep asking myself this until I reach a conclusion.
Comments
Post a Comment